SOKOBAN

I’m not talking about anonymous players, I’m talking about registered players. I’m thinking about a way to include their skills: complexity of game, efficiency of player.

The point-list will disappear by itself. (if anonymous is excluded). That is cause, (I repeat myself) the "anonymous" is "in time" taking all the first places. And the rest of us ,are not achieve any points. And neither is anonymous. To put it short, if all levels are win by anonymous, there will be not points to give to anybody. (it's empty). I suppose, we have to give "points" to all results, not just to the first solution.

I think we overlook something. In the new winnerlists we only grant points to players with the shortest solution. However: if a player completes a very difficult game in some more moves than the winner(s) of that game did, he doesn’t receive anything whatsoever. Many first place winners of simple games earn points now, while second (third, etc.) solvers of very complex games get nothing. How can this be set right?

Yeah, he's my hero too! His appearance confirms the value of new list. Special thanks to MnLsDad for intelligent idea and admin for smart programming! I suppose luyan would even score higher in fourth list I suggested...

Ok! Glad to see also luyans name appearing to the list, finally, he's my hero.

Congratulations for leading the third table too! As explanation in last row says, the table is based on the original idea of MnLsDad (point/winners), thus including the 'complexity of solution'. A fourth table, based on my additional suggestion (point/winners/solvers), would include the 'complexity of game' too. To admin1: can this be made? (with the risk of overheating and eventual explosion of server)

To Admin1: or Arnold: Is the new list based on this: Quote: 1 point/1 winner/100 solvers = 1/100 for winner and 1 point/1 winner/3 solvers = 1/3 for winner. What it tells? I don't get it.

to admin1: Fantastic!

to Arnold: the new rating is ready, the points were computed excluding anonymous scores.

That's the current situation indeed. Our suggestions for change are clear. It's up to admin to make that change.